Aside from the control feel it's a good test of both connection speeds and rendering ability at a very high level.If you are worried about security, there is no need to be. My main test for most remote control iPod/iPhone apps is how well they transmit and render while Flash videos (singular) are running. Then again for a non-commercial use free program TeamViewer isn't to bad for basic uses. I need to test more on pushing the connection speeds and run iTeleport under the same encryption. Removes the background of the monitor you're primary viewing (on mac) and replaces it with flat blue (a good bandwidth saving technique for other remote control program use, although possibly annoying from an esthetics sense). Keyboard is interesting and auto adjusts to rotation, they could have picked a better keyboard close icon which looks like the eject button on a Mac (not smart). No multi-monitor support, requires switching in the settings (shake iPod for quick switch, guess its okay as a bandwidth saving tactic).
Zoom button seems redundant until you realize the pinch zoom is sluggish and inaccurate. Has the track pad like mouse control by default which is a plus.
Okay for the free version its not to bad. I totally agree, bigger screen on iPad will be better for all remote PC viewing/control programs. That track pad style mouse helps take out a great deal of inaccuracy when doing fine manipulation. I'll give TeamViewer a try now, however one thing I really like about iTeleport is its option for both a tap mouse and a standard mouse (the mouse stays on screen and you can drag it around like a track pad). I don't think Windows does, which is likely a good thing for all. Mac OSX has a built in VNC screen sharing service. I also have RemoteTap which needs some serious work before it becomes really as viable as iTeleport. I have not tried running remote session over the wider internet through a SSH connection. I have not used TeamViewer but I regularly use iTeleport in a local WiFi network situation.
0 kommentar(er)
